22.10. 2009 Tunne Kelam: There is a third party in Russian-Georgian conflict
In Kelam's words, one has for a too
long time and too easily become used to the existence of the so-called
frozen conflicts. Accommodating to the existence of these conflicts
equals appeasement.
"The central conclusion to be drawn
from the conflict is that Georgia did not invade the territory of
Russian Federation whereas Russian invaded with massive military force
the Georgian territory and was about to occupy its capital city",
stated Kelam.
According to Kelam, this was an
unprecedented breach of basic norms of international conduct that
dramatically undermined Russia's credibility as a reliable partner.
International reaction to this conflict
has been ambiguous, said Kelam. Terming this invasion as an "excessive
use of force" can be assessed only as a continuing appeasement. While
Russian leaders have apparently succeeded to avoid any international
consequences of their military invasion, they see themselves as winners.
"Alarmingly, this has in fact increased
the likelihood of new Russian military aggressions in the areas like
Crimea or even in the Baltic Sea region", Kelam warned.
In Kelam's opinion, a EU's strong
presence and clear commitment in guaranteeing Georgia's freedom to
choose its future path and retain its territorial integrity will be of
utmost importance.